Who Is To Blame In The Crucible Essay Example For Students

Who Is To Blame In The Crucible Essay In the play The Crucible, Millers picture, of the Salem witch hunts of 1692 may fitly be examined as a work of dramatic art, as a product of the author, and as a social document. A major character that enabled the dramatic art to come into play is John Proctor himself who was a leading character and Arthur Miller built up to the big scenes seen throughout the play where the characters are made to be seen as more appealing. The characterization shown with John Proctor was not only detailed but an essential part of the play. Without Proctor having a part through the play, it would have been dull and boring. John Proctor was hardheaded, strong and skeptical. The Tenacity of his beloved wife Elizabeth is, nevertheless made to weaken, to confess to a lie in order to give a more theatrical effect to his final resolve to proclaim, and to die for, the truth. On the other hand, Proctor will lie privately, but he refuses to sign so that his lie can be made public. John felt if others knew of h is lies he would have a bad name. He always wanted to have a good name. We will write a custom essay on Who Is To Blame In The Crucible specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now When in court John was questioned as to whether he was having or not having an affair with Abigail. The questions were directed toward Johns wife Elizabeth. Proctor had made certain to the judge that Elizabeth could not and certainly would not lie. Sure enough, when Elizabeth was questioned she ended up lying to try to save her husbands reputation from being ruined, Meanwhile she had no idea what John had previously stated and how this wouldbring on the deterioration of his character. This is where irony took its part, with Elizabeth testifying that John certainly is not a lecher but, John previously admitted Abigail was his eager whore. This twist gave a dramatic effect toward The power shown in the big scene with the maid who had withdrawn from the accusation made toward her for witchcraft certainly made the tension grow and as Shipley said, The climatic growth of tension here is excellently managed. I agree with what Shipley says because with this occurring as the play is taking p lace, it enables the reader to be in suspense right up until the end. To some people this play may not be a creation of dramatic art, rather a concoction of the authors contriving mind. I disagree with this because I feel as though this is a dramatic form of art because many elements were shown which make something dramatic such as the accusations and the trial in itself. Before the judges, Abigail and her friends claim that they can feel the presence of the devil like a rushing, mighty wind, which is magnificently dramatic and It is safe to say the Arthur Millers play was based on troublous times, and because certain elements of the society look at the theater as a weapon in the class war, the play can bee seen from many different views. A person could read this play and get a lot out of it without knowing much about it when they began. The first act was confusing and yet the last act opening was intended to provide an emotional rest, there was no sense really being made. However i n the end looking back on the play as a whole, something does come out of it and to each person it is something different although definitely worthwhile. Bibliography: Who is to blame in The Crucible Essay Example For Students Who is to blame in The Crucible? Essay The Crucible was first produced in 1953 in 1952 in the middle of the McCarthy political witch hunts. Miller was trying to convey the parallel between the witch-hunts in Salem and the witch hunts for communists. The hysteria in Salem can be blamed on the individuals or the whole society. Although many individuals contributed to the hysteria the social conditions the characters, the young girls in particular, had to endure is also to blame. There are a number of characters to which some degree of blame could be attributed. One of these characters is Abigail. Abigail is the character who really gets the whole thing started; Uncle, we did dance We will write a custom essay on Who is to blame in The Crucible? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now She first openly admits to dancing in the woods and when the pressure is put on her she says that it was to blame on witchcraft. She uses the situation to her advantage and manages to get back at Goody Proctor who has blackened her name in the village. Although she is very manipulative in some ways she is a victim. She is treated as a child even though she is no longer innocent and virginal; Sweated like a stallion Abigail is very forward and speaks and acts like she is much older than she is. She is a young adult but nobody will treat her like one. Abigail had a relationship with Proctor, but still he calls her a child. Abigail seems to want to break free of the stereotype and this is what leads to hysteria. Abigail did not plan for the situation to get out of hand or lead to the death of innocent people, but she could not really stop it once the ball had started rolling. The accusations led to the hysteria to spiral out of control as more and more people were blamed. Society really is to blame though when it comes to Abigail as society put great pressure on her, which led her to try and break free of her stereotype. Another character that contributes to the hysteria is Parris. The way Parris approached his ministry led to problems. His selfish attitude contributes to the reaction of the girls. The way he runs the church leads to resentment and bad blood in the village. He should be preaching about God but instead he preaches about money. He is always thinking about himself too much and does not consider others; I cannot offer one proposition, but there be a howling riot of argument He may have been able to solve the problems but he couldnt be bothered with the hassle of it and would rather deal with his own problems. He is selfish and only really thinks about money. He thinks he deserves luxuries because he is a minister; Dont a minister deserve a house to live in His selfish attitude contributed to the hysteria in Salem. In some ways it is society to blame  for creating the conditions in which man like Parris, who is quite obviously not a very holy man, can lord it over others simply because he has the title of priest. John Proctor also contributes to the hysteria in Salem. His inability to control his lust contributes to events. His lust for Abigail led Abigail to believe that there could be a proper relationship between them; Ill not be comin for you no more He does try to make it clear to Abigail but he has already led her on too much. When Proctor calls her child it makes Abigail want to prove herself to him and she shows him how powerful she can really be. .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c , .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c .postImageUrl , .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c , .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c:hover , .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c:visited , .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c:active { border:0!important; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c:active , .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf116089856748cd4fd4e6e5ad16ce45c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Cross-Cutting Blood Brothers EssayIt seems as though if he had come forward earlier then he could have stopped what was happening. He would not admit to adultery because he did not want his name blackened in the village. Society is really to blame because it condemned sexual impropriety and it made him feel that he could not confess because it is a sin. Putnam is another one of the characters that contributes to the hysteria. He is the prime example of the land owning citizen. He seems to be motivated to make the problem worse. He is very selfish about his land and possessions; You load one oak of mine and youll fight to drag it home He is always fighting and bickering with other people about what belongs to him. As a prominent citizen he could have stopped the hysteria rather than fuelling it. He, instead of dealing with the problems he would rather try and gain more land by getting his daughter to cry rape. Society really is to blame for creating a man like Putnam who is given power through possession of money and use that power for greed. In fact Proctor indicates how the village seems based on money not equality. There is also a collective blame. All the characters build up to create a society, which is prone to this type of situation. The land disputes add to the problems. No single character tries to whole heartedly to solve the crisis because of fear of damaging their own reputation. The way women and children are treated also contributes to the problem. Many of the young women are treated like children and want to demolish the stereotype. There are certain attitudes towards pleasure which means that many of the girls would have had a starved imagination and social life which would have made the witch hunts seem exciting and appealing. The girls were rarely made centre of attention so this sudden interest shown towards them would have also been appealing. It would have seemed ridiculous to them to remove themselves for the spotlight, which they rarely have upon them. Overall it was the whole of society to blame rather than the individual characters. As the village was in the middle of  nowhere there was no escape. This made the situation more intense because everyone was trapped. These external influences slightly contribute to the atmosphere. There are many parallels between the society in Salem and the communist witch hunts. Both conditions are similar; in both cases people are being persecuted without a proper trial or any evidence. Both societies have resentments and jealousies. Miller uses the book to create an absurd situation to mock the McCarthy witch-hunts. It is the individual characters that contribute to the chaos. All of the characters build up to create a society prone to this type of situation.